Dentistry & Health Care Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Newly-identified Occupational Hazard for Dentists

The practice of dentistry is associated with a variety of occupational hazards. These are largely preventable, or can be minimized, by taking precautions to reduce the risk of exposure. Occupational hazards can largely be categorized as risk of exposure to chemicals and other noxious substances, risk of physical injury, and risk of infection and disease transmission.1Saccucci M, Ierardo G, Protano C, Vitali M, Polimeni A. How to manage the biological risk in a dental clinic: current and future perspectives. Minerva Stomatol 2017;66(5):232-9.,2Bârlean L, Dănilă I, Săveanu I, Balcoş C. Occupational health problems among dentists in Moldavian Region of Romania. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2013;117(3):784-8.,3Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infection prevention & control guidelines & recommendations. Summary of infection prevention practices in dental settings: Basic expectations for safe care. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/infectioncontrol/guidelines/index.htm.,4Occupational Health and Safety Administration. Available at: www.osha.org. Most recently, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a fatal lung disease, has been identified as an occupational hazard in dentistry.

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Recently, a newly identified work-related hazard for dentists and dental personnel was identified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States.5Nett RJ, Cummings KJ, Cannon B, Cox-Ganser J, Nathan SD. Dental personnel treated for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis at a tertiary care center – Virginia, 2000-2015. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018;67(9):270-3. Data from a tertiary care hospital revealed that between 2000 and 2015, 894 patients were treated for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) including 8 dentists and 1 dental technician. Their mean age was 64 years, 7 of the 9 patients had died, and the median time of survival from initial diagnosis was 3 years. (Table 1)

IPF is a progressive pneumonia that involves scarring of the lungs and fibrosis of the interstitial areas due to ongoing deposition of collagen in the cells that line the bronchial alveolar spaces. While the cause of IPF is not fully understood, this disorder has been associated with exposure to cigarette smoke, viral infection, metal and coal dust, and agricultural environments.6Kuehn B. Dentists at risk of lung disease? J Am Med Assoc 2018;319(16):1650. IPF is a chronic condition with a median survival of 3 to 5 years.7Richeldi L, Collard HR, Jone MG. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lancet 2017;389(10082):1941-52.

This was the first known IPF cluster among persons in the dental profession. Based on the regional population and number of dentists, this cluster represents an almost 23 times higher rate of occurrence. The CDC report noted limitations of the analysis, including data from only one center, and lack of complete information regarding environmental exposures. However, the report also noted that dentists and others in the profession are exposed to a wide range of inhaled environmental hazards, which may pose a significant risk for the development of IPF in the absence of personnel protective equipment and other safety precautions.

Dentists and others in the profession are exposed to a wide range of inhaled environmental hazards, which may pose a significant risk for the development of IPF in the absence of personal protective equipment and other safety precautions.

Other Lung Disorders

While relatively uncommon overall,8Chung SJ, Koo GW, Park DW, Kwak HJ, Yhi JY, Moon JY, Kim SH, Sohn JW, Yoon HJ, Shin DH, Park SS, Pyo JY, Oh YH, Kim TH. Pulmonary foreign body granulomatosis in dental technician. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2015;78(4):445-9. occupational lung disease has been reported more often in dental technicians than in dentists. Lung disorders affecting dental technicians globally include reduced lung function, silicosis, asbestosis, granulomatosis, asthma, and pneumoconiosis.8Chung SJ, Koo GW, Park DW, Kwak HJ, Yhi JY, Moon JY, Kim SH, Sohn JW, Yoon HJ, Shin DH, Park SS, Pyo JY, Oh YH, Kim TH. Pulmonary foreign body granulomatosis in dental technician. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2015;78(4):445-9. These have been associated with a lack of, or insufficient, protection (e.g., dust masks) against exposure to chrome-cobalt-molybdenum alloys, beryllium, silica, asbestos, acrylic dust and/or other materials. In a CDC report, silicosis was confirmed in nine dental laboratory technicians in a variety of locations in the United States between 1994 and 2000, associated with exposure to silica dust.9CDC. Silicosis in dental laboratory technicians — five states, 1994—2000. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53(09):195-97. In one of the cases, asbestosis and berylliosis were also diagnosed. (Table 1)

Further, in 2017 it was reported that 6 older dentists in the United States had been diagnosed with malignant mesothelioma associated with brief exposures to asbestos-containing dental tape, which was used for casting rings until the 1970s.10Markowitz SB, Moline JM. Malignant mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure in dental tape. Am J Ind Med 2017;60(5):437-2. (Table 1) Four cases of dentists with mesothelioma were also reported in Italy in a 2017 publication, and one case previously. These were rare tragic occurrences, but preventable with proper precautions.11Mensi C, Ciullo F, Barbieri GP, Riboldi L, Somigliana A, Rasperini G, Pesatori AC, Consonni D. Pleural malignant mesothelioma in dental laboratory technicians: A case series. Am J Ind Med 2017;60(5):443-8.

Table 1. Lung diseases identified as occupational hazards in dental professionals and personnel
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Silicosis
Asbestosis
Granulomatosis
Asthma
Pneumoconiosis
Berylliosis
Malignant mesothelioma

Respiratory hypersensitivity has also been reported among dentists and dental personnel. In Finland, 62 cases were diagnosed between 1989 and 1998, compared to 2 cases from 1975 up until 1989. By 1995 respiratory hypersensitivity was twice as prevalent as in the general population.12Piirilä P, Hodgson U, Estlander T, Keskinen H, Saalo A, Voutilainen R, Kanerva L. Occupational respiratory hypersensitivity in dental personnel. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2002;75(4):209-16. Of 28 cases of rhinitis and asthma reported, 24 resulted from exposure to methacrylates.12Piirilä P, Hodgson U, Estlander T, Keskinen H, Saalo A, Voutilainen R, Kanerva L. Occupational respiratory hypersensitivity in dental personnel. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2002;75(4):209-16. Among almost 800 dental assistants, daily exposure to methacrylates resulted in a more than two-fold increased risk of adult-onset asthma, as well as a 37% and 69% increased risk, respectively, of nasal hypersensitivity or a cough/phlegm.13Jaakkola MS, Leino T, Tammilehto L, Ylöstalo P, Kuosma E, Alanko K. Respiratory effects of exposure to methacrylates among dental assistants. Allergy 2007;62(6):648-54. (Figure 1) Among individuals at greater risk for atopic disease, the risk of asthma was increased by more than 300%. Further, a dose-response relationship was observed.13Jaakkola MS, Leino T, Tammilehto L, Ylöstalo P, Kuosma E, Alanko K. Respiratory effects of exposure to methacrylates among dental assistants. Allergy 2007;62(6):648-54.

Figure 1. Increased risk for condition with daily exposure to methacrylates



Among almost 800 dental assistants, daily exposure to methacrylates resulted in a more than two-fold increased risk of adult-onset asthma.

Risk of transmission of microorganisms and infectious diseases

Risk of exposure to microorganisms in the dental setting is well-recognized, including those causing diseases affecting the lungs. An Austrian study in 1987 concluded that dentists and dental personnel were at increased risk of Legionella infection.14Reinthaler F, Mascher F, Stünzner D. Legionella pneumophila: seroepidemiologic studies of dentists and dental personnel in Austria. [Article in German] Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B 1987;185(1-2):164-70. However, a meta-analysis of 7 studies found no evidence of increased risk of Legionella infection for dental personnel for studies conducted after 1998, attributed to infection control protocols and possibly differences in the municipal water supply.15Petti S, Vitali M. Occupational risk for Legionella infection among dental healthcare workers: meta-analysis in occupational epidemiology. BMJ Open 2017;7(7):e015374. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015374. This concurs with the finding of a similar risk level to the general population in ADA Health Screening Programs conducted between 2002 and 2012,16Estrich CG, Gruninger SE, Lipman RD. Rates and predictors of exposure to Legionella pneumophila in the United States among dental practitioners: 2002 through 2012. J Am Dent Assoc 2017;148(3):164-171. and highlights the importance of infection control protocols. In 2014, transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and subsequent active tuberculosis (TB) was reported in an office. However, recommended infection control protocols and policies related to TB had not been followed.17Merte JL, Kroll CM, Collins AS, Melnick AL. An epidemiologic investigation of occupational transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection to dental health care personnel: infection prevention and control implications. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145(5):464-71.

A meta-analysis of 7 studies found no evidence of increased risk of Legionella infection for dental personnel for studies conducted after 1998, attributed to infection control protocols and possibly differences in the municipal water supply.

Implications for Dentistry

Appropriate personal protective equipment is essential to prevent and reduce injury, disease transmission and exposure to chemicals and other potentially noxious materials. Additional measures needed to reduce risk of exposure and infection with pathogens include inoculations, hand hygiene, personal protective equipment, and adherence to other infection prevention and control measures.

The individuals diagnosed with IPF began practice at a time when the profession was not as concerned about occupational exposure as it is today. The need for respiratory protection in emphasized by the CDC report, and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-certified respirators have been recommended.6Kuehn B. Dentists at risk of lung disease? J Am Med Assoc 2018;319(16):1650. Individuals with sensitivity/allergies to specific chemicals and materials should avoid their use. Chemicals and materials must be handled and stored in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions for use, recommendations and regulations. Further, safety and health requirements must be met. Safety data sheets provide detailed information on chemicals, hazards, avoiding and treating exposures.

Chemicals and materials must be handled in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions for use, recommendations and regulations, and safety and health requirements must be met.

Conclusions

Dentists, dental personnel and dental technicians must be aware of occupational risks associated with dentistry, including inhaled hazards. It is essential that dentists, dental personnel and dental technicians diligently follow established infection control and prevention guidelines, and health and safety regulations, designed to reduce the risk of injury, transmission of microorganisms and disease, and the risk of exposure to noxious substances.

References

  • 1.Zimmerli B, Jeger F, Lussi A. Bleaching of nonvital teeth. A clinically relevant literature review. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2010;120(4):306-20.
  • 2.Brunton PA, Burke FJT, Sharif MO et al. Contemporary dental practice in the UK in 2008: Aspects of direct restorations, endodontics, and bleaching. Br Dent J 2012;212:63-7.
  • 3.Demarco FF, Conde MCM, Ely C et al. Preferences on vital and nonvital tooth bleaching: A survey among dentists from a city of Southern Brazil. Braz Dent J 2013;24:527-31.
  • 4.Kahler B. Present status and future directions – Managing discoloured teeth. Int Endod J 2022: Feb 21. doi: 10.1111/iej.13711.
  • 5.Nutting EB, Poe GS. Chemical bleaching of discolored endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin N Am 1967;11:655-62.
  • 6.Pallarés-Serrano A, Pallarés-Serrano S, Pallarés-Serrano A, Pallarés-Sabater A. Assessment of Oxygen Expansion during Internal Bleaching with Enamel and Dentin: A Comparative In Vitro Study. Dent J 2021;9:98. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9090098.
  • 7.Estay J, Angel P, Bersezio C et al. The change of teeth color, whiteness variations and its psychosocial and self-perception effects when using low vs. high concentration bleaching gels: a one-year follow-up. BMC Oral Health 2020;20(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01244-x.
  • 8.Haywood VB, Bergeron BE. Bleaching and the Diagnosis of Internal Resorption. Jul 24, 2018. https://decisionsindentistry.com/article/bleaching-and-the-diagnosis-of-internal-resorption/
  • 9.Abbott P, Heah SY. Internal bleaching of teeth: an analysis of 255 teeth. Aust Dent J 2009;54(4):326-33. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01158.x.
  • 10.Sakalli B, Basmaci F, Dalmizrak O. Evaluation of the penetration of intracoronal bleaching agents into the cervical region using different intraorifice barriers. BMC Oral Health 2022;22(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02300-4.
  • 11.American Association of Endodontists Clinical Practice Committee. Use of Silver Points. AAE Position Statement. https://www.aae.org/specialty/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/06/silverpointsstatement.pdf#:~:text=Silver%20points%20have%20been%20shown%20to%20corrode%20spontaneously,retreatment%20and%20replacement%20of%20the%20points%20with%20another.
  • 12.Savadkouhi ST, Fazlyab M. Discoloration Potential of Endodontic Sealers: A Brief Review. Iran Endod J 2016;11(4):250-4. doi: 10.22037/iej.2016.20.
  • 13.Ahmed HM, Abbott PV. Discolouration potential of endodontic procedures and materials: a review. Int Endod J 2012;45(10):883-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02071.x.
  • 14.Krastl G, Allgayer N, Lenherr P et al. Tooth discoloration induced by endodontic materials: a literature review. Dent Traumatol 2013;29(1):2-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2012.01141.x.
  • 15.Ioannidis K, Mistakidis I, Beltes P, Karagiannis V. Spectrophotometric analysis of crown discoloration induced by MTA- and ZnOE-based sealers. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21(2):138-44. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757201302254.
  • 16.Santos LGPD, Chisini LA, Springmann CG et al. Alternative to Avoid Tooth Discoloration after Regenerative Endodontic Procedure: A Systematic Review. Braz Dent J 2018;29(5):409-18. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201802132.
  • 17.Watts A, Addy M. Tooth discoloration and staining: a review of the literature. Br Dent J 2001;190:309-16.
  • 18.Pink tooth of Mummery. https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Pink+Tooth+of+Mummery.
  • 19.Haywood VB. History, safety, and effectiveness of current bleaching techniques and applications of the nightguard vital bleaching technique. Quintessence Int 1992:23:471-88. http://www.quintpub.com/userhome/qi/qi_23_7_haywood_6.pdf
  • 20.Bersezio C, Ledezma P, Mayer C et al. Effectiveness and effect of non-vital bleaching on the quality of life of patients up to 6 months post-treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22(9):3013-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2389-y.
  • 21.Popescu AD, Purcarea MV, Georgescu RV et al. Vital and Non-Vital Tooth Bleaching Procedures: A Survey Among Dentists From Romania. Rom J Oral Rehab 2021;13(3):59-71. https://www.rjor.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/VITAL-AND-NON-VITAL-TOOTH-BLEACHING-PROCEDURES-A-SURVEY-AMONG-DENTISTS-FROM-ROMANIA.pdf.
  • 22.Zarean P, Zarean P, Ravaghi A et al. Comparison of MTA, CEM Cement, and Biodentine as Coronal Plug during Internal Bleaching: An In Vitro Study. Int J Dent 2020;2020:8896740. doi: 10.1155/2020/8896740.
  • 23.Canoglu E, Gulsahi K, Sahin C et al. Effect of bleaching agents on sealing properties of different intraorifice barriers and root filling materials. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17 (4):e710-5. http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/v17i4/medoralv17i4p710.pdf
  • 24.Amato A, Caggiano M, Pantaleo G, Amato M. In-office and walking bleach dental treatments on endodontically-treated teeth: 25 years follow-up. Minerva Stomatol 2018;67(6):225-30.
  • 25.Lim MY, Lum SOY, Poh RSC et al. An in vitro comparison of the bleaching efficacy of 35% carbamide peroxide with established intracoronal bleaching agents. Int Endod J 2004;37(7):483-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00829.x.
  • 26.Yui KCK, Rodrigues JR, Mancini MNG et al. Ex vivo evaluation of the effectiveness of bleaching agents on the shade alteration of blood-stained teeth. Int Endod J 2008;41(6):485-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01379.x.
  • 27.Warren MA, Wong M, Ingram TA III. An in vitro comparison of bleaching agents on the crowns and roots of discolored teeth. J Endod 1990;16:463-7.
  • 28.Rotstein I, Mor C, Friedman S. Prognosis of intracoronal bleaching with sodium perborate preparations in vitro: 1-year study. J Endod 1993;19:10-2.
  • 29.Weiger R, Kuhn A, Lost C. In vitro comparison of various types of sodium perborate used for intracoronal bleaching of discolored teeth. J Endod 1994;20:338-41.
  • 30.Amato M, Scaravilli MS, Farella M, Riccitiello F. Bleaching teeth treated endodontically: long-term evaluation of a case series. J Endod 2006;32:376-8.
  • 31.Abou-Rass M. Long-term prognosis of intentional endodontics and internal bleaching of tetracycline-stained teeth. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19:1034-44.
  • 32.Anitua E, Zabalegui B, Gil J, Gascon F. Internal bleaching of severe tetracycline discolorations: four-year clinical evaluation. Quintessence Int 1990;21(10):783-8.
  • 33.Gorr S-U, Brigman HV, Anderson JC, Hirsch EB. The antimicrobial peptide DGL13K is active against drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria and sub-inhibitory concentrations stimulate bacterial growth without causing resistance. PLoS ONE 2022;17(8): e0273504. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273504.
  • 34.Peters SM, Hill NB, Halepas S. Oral manifestations of monkeypox: A report of two cases Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2022.07.147.
  • 35.Portalatin A. Infectious disease experts call on dentists to monitor monkeypox symptoms: 6 notes. August 15, 2022. https://www.beckersdental.com/clinical-leadership-infection-control/39124-infectious-disease-experts-call-on-dentists-to-monitor-monkeypox-symptoms-6-notes.html?origin=DentalE&utm_source=DentalE&utm_medium=email&utm_content=newsletter&oly_enc_id=1694C1316967A3F.
  • 36.CDC. Monkeypox. Non-Variola Orthopoxvirus and Monkeypox Virus Laboratory Testing Data. August 17, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/response/2022/2022-lab-test.html.
  • 37.CDC. Monkeypox. Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/prevention.html.
  • 38.CDC. Monkeypox and smallpox vaccine guidance. Updated June 2, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/clinicians/index.htm.
  • 39.CDC. Monkeypox. ACAM Vaccine. https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/interim-considerations/acam2000-vaccine.html.
  • 40.CDC. Guidelines for Infection Control in Dental Health-Care Settings — 2003. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5217.pdf.
  • 41.CDC. Infection Prevention and Control of Monkeypox in Healthcare Settings. Updated August 11, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/clinicians/infection-control-healthcare.html
  • 42.CDC. Monkeypox. Information For Veterinarians. https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/veterinarian/index.html.
  • 43.CDC. Monkeypox. Pets in the Home. https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/prevention/pets-in-homes.html.
  • 44.Cheng YL, Musonda J, Cheng H, et al. Effect of surface removal following bleaching on the bond strength of enamel. BMC Oral Health 2019;19(1):50.
  • 45.Monteiro D, Moreira A, Cornacchia T, Magalhães C. Evaluation of the effect of different enamel surface treatments and waiting times on the staining prevention after bleaching. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9(5):e677-81.
  • 46.Rezende M, Kapuchczinski AC, Vochikovski L, et al. Staining power of natural and artificial dyes after at-home dental bleaching. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(4):424-7.
  • 47.Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Effect of xylitol versus sorbitol: a quantitative systematic review of clinical trials. Int Dent J 2012;62(4):175-88.
  • 48.Rethman MP, Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Billings RJ, Burne RA, Clark M, Donly KJ, Hujoel PP, Katz BP, Milgrom P, Sohn W, Stamm JW, Watson G, Wolff M, Wright T, Zero D, Aravamudhan K, Frantsve-Hawley J, Meyer DM; for the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs Expert Panel on Nonfluoride Caries-Preventive Agents. Nonfluoride caries-preventive agents. Executive summary of evidence-based clinical recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142(9):1065-71.
  • 49.Milgrom P, Söderling EM, Nelson S, Chi DL, Nakai Y. Clinical evidence for polyol efficacy. Adv Dent Res 2012; 24(2):112-6.
Login to access